Covering Crime and Justice Written and edited by
Criminal Justice Journalists
www.reporters.net/cjj/

Search by:
  Table of Contents

  Topics
  

  Text Search
  

Chapter Sidebars
  • Resources
  • Story Ideas

Chapter 3
Reporting on Drug Law Enforcement
and Controlled Substances

In this chapter


Introduction
The Drug War's
   Rising Costs
What are Controlled
   Substances?
   Types of Drug Offenses
Following the Money
The Changing Face
   of the Law
Identifying Potential
   Contacts
Cultivating Your
   Sources
Think Outside
   the Box
Focusing Your Lens
Arrest and Trial
Translating Blotters
   and Calendars
Covering Arrests
   Preliminary
   Examinations

Procedural
   Differences
Other Crucial
   Documents
Making a Federal
   Case of It
Fleshing Out
   The Story



     

Focusing Your Lens
When you contact these sources ask them to tell you about big cases that have either already been prosecuted or are currently awaiting trial. Look cases up in the court clerk's office and read the case files for background information. Many reporters become involved in a criminal case at only three points: when charges are originally filed, when the opening arguments are heard in court, and when a verdict is handed down.

In between these key events, prosecutors and defense attorneys file reams of paper with the court, including routine motions, requests for information from law enforcement agencies, sworn affidavits from witnesses and investigators and other documentary materials. Often these filings occur when there is nothing happening in the courtroom, so a reporter who keeps an eye on the file in a major drug case will sometimes happen on major developments that can be fashioned into a news story.

Arrest and Trial
No matter how carefully you prepare to cover the drug enforcement beat, how familiar you are with the law and the terminology or how well you have cultivated your sources, you may not have a story until somebody gets arrested for a drug offense. Finding out about arrests is a critical part of the beat.

Some agencies – particularly larger departments or federal agencies – will issue press releases about drug busts or investigations after they make arrests. But smaller departments or those outside urban areas tend to avoid drawing media attention to themselves, even when they believe that publicity might be useful. If you have been successful in your source-building, you may have developed contacts that will tell you that a big case has resulted in arrests – or even tip you off before the arrests begin. Otherwise, the chances are good that you will have to use your own initiative to dig up the story.

If you have a scanner radio, you may be able to program in the frequencies used by local public safety agencies and find out about police operations by listening to officers' radio traffic. If you haven't the time or the resources to use a scanner, you will have to learn about an agency's drug enforcement operations after the fact by reviewing its blotter information or field activity reports.

Reporters who cover local courts will probably first hear about major drug cases from contacts in the courthouse, or by reviewing the morning and afternoon criminal calendars. Calendar information, like blotter data, is rather limited. It usually gives the name of the accused, the code section that was allegedly violated, the date of the arrest, the name of the judge who has been assigned the case and location of the courtroom.

Translating Blotters and Calendars
In order to make sense of blotter and criminal calendar entries, reporters and the editors and producers who work with them will want to familiarize themselves with the laws that relate to controlled substances in their jurisdiction. Each state's criminal code contains similar provisions governing dangerous drugs, but not all are organized the same way.

In addition, some local jurisdictions have their own city or county ordinances that relate to particular drug offenses, and blotter and calendar entries in those jurisdictions may refer to Municipal Code or County Statute numbers in addition to, or instead of, the relevant section of the state code.

Federal narcotics and dangerous drug laws fall under Title 21 of the U.S. Code. Calendar information in federal courts will identify alleged offenses by that title and the relevant federal law section.

Covering Arrests
Once a reporter has discovered that an arrest took place, the real reporting begins. Call the department's public information officer if it has one, the operations or watch officer or the officer in charge of the unit that made the pinch. Ask for details about the operation, including how many officers were involved, what agencies they came from and how long the alleged network had been under investigation before the arrests were made. Find out who was arrested, who is still at large and what illicit materials were seized. You will want to know what types of drugs were being dealt and the size of the business. Where did the drugs come from? Was the operation a stand-alone or part of a bigger network?

Law enforcement agencies involved in drug suppression activity often stage photo opportunities at which drugs, weapons and other items seized during a large investigation can be photographed. Usually a police agency will have one of more of the investigators who participated in the bust available at these sessions to answer questions. It is worth going to these dog-and-pony shows in order to get a first-hand view of the contraband and an opportunity to talk to one or more of the people who made the case.

Pay particularly close attention to bail hearings and their federal counterpart, the detention hearing. During these proceedings, the prosecutor may release additional details about the alleged crimes while attempting to secure a higher figure. In addition, attorneys for the accused may divulge details about the suspect's place of employment, family ties, property holdings and marital status while trying to secure his or her release.

In any of these proceedings, prosecutors may argue that the defendant should continue to be held in custody because he or she is likely to flee or engage in further criminal activity if released. When they do, they may reveal more information about the suspect's background and a more detailed description of the criminal activity the defendant allegedly committed.

Preliminary Examinations
The preliminary examination, sometimes called a preliminary hearing, is a crucial part of the judicial proceeding in a drug case. During it, the prosecution calls witnesses to establish probable cause – evidence that the crime charged took place and the suspect was responsible for it. The witnesses who testify for the prosecution usually include investigators who participated in the probe that led to the arrest. They will probably discuss noteworthy details about the case, including the origin of the investigation, its organization and the nature of the evidence it collected.

Although the preliminary examination is an adversary proceeding and legal counsel represents the accused, the attorney for the defense generally does not put on his own witnesses during the hearing, and frequently will only cross-examine the prosecution's witnesses in an effort to expose weaknesses in the evidence or the investigative procedures that led to the charges.

Attending these court appearances is an important part of covering drug enforcement operations, but an equally important task is reviewing the documentary materials that will emerge as a given case works its way through the system. Those papers may contain details you neglected to ask about, or that your sources have been unwilling to discuss. As a consequence, a reporter covering the drug beat – or any other type of criminal case – should become familiar with the types of records available and refer to them frequently as the case develops.

Continue to the next page in "Chapter 3: Reporting on Drug Law Enforcement" >>>
<<< Return to the previous page in "Chapter 3: Reporting on Drug Law Enforcement"

 

 



© 2003 Criminal Justice Journalists

Created with the cooperation of the Institute for Justice and Journalism, Annenberg School for Communication, University of Southern California,
and the Jerry Lee Center of Criminology, University of Pennsylvania

Made possible by a grant from the Ford Foundation