Covering Crime and Justice Written and edited by
Criminal Justice Journalists
www.reporters.net/cjj/

Search by:
  Table of Contents

  Topics
  

  Text Search
  

Chapter Sidebars
  • Resources
  • Story Ideas

Chapter 7
Covering the Courts

In this chapter


Introduction
Court Organization
Federal Courts
Covering The Beat
   Be observant
   Listen to the beat
   Be concise

Follow The Paper
The Docket Sheet Grows
Sources
   Administration
   The Lawyers

Before The Trial
Trials
Judges
Judicial Selection
Appeals
Access



     

Listen to the beat
It is important to develop a routine or sense of rhythm in covering a courthouse. Learn when the judges typically begin their morning calls, take lunch breaks and recess for the day so that you won’t waste time waiting for them if you need to talk to them or obtain information from their staffs. Learn when prosecutors and defense lawyers typically begin assembling outside courtrooms. Be respectful of everyone; you never can tell who may be of great help. (Once, while covering the criminal trial of U.S. congressman from Illinois who was accused of obstruction of justice and engaging in sex with underage campaign workers, I came to the press room to find that all my daily files—a separate file for each day with my notes and purchases of partial transcripts—had disappeared. Because I had a good working relationship with the janitorial staff, I was able to quickly get access to the loading dock where after 20 minutes of poking and digging through the back of a garage truck, I found all my files. Some overzealous, newly hired janitor had mistaken my box of files—not-so-strategically located next to the wastebasket—as garbage and tossed them.) The clerk you treat with respect and dignity today will be the clerk who lets you stay past closing one day to copy a lawsuit filed at the last minute. The late (and convicted of bribery) Cook County Circuit Judge Wayne Olson put it best: “Don’t kick your janitor in the ass, for one day he may be your landlord.”

Be concise
Avoid jargon. Report with precision. Know what you are writing about. This last admonition would seem obvious, but when you are writing about legal matters, it is always advisable to attempt to understand the legal principle or theory that you are addressing. At the very least, you can help prevent editors from editing mistakes into your reports because of their lack of understanding.

For example, the federal government may file a motion titled: “United States’ Reply To Defendant’s Motion In Opposition To The United States’ Motion For In-Chambers Voir Dire.” Translating, you may report: “The federal government Tuesday opposed an attempt by defense attorneys for accused mobster Joey “Sad Eyes” to select a jury in public because of fears that jurors would be targeted for threats.”

Do not oversimplify, however, to the point that the legal significance of a report becomes muddled or inaccurate. While the facts and the personalities or institutions are important, so, too, are the legal principles involved. While these legal principles may not be explained in depth, you must understand them to accurately report the story you are covering.

Finally, if you are unsure about something, ask someone who knows. Don’t guess. It can save you lots of embarrassment in the long term. A reporter in Chattanooga, Tennessee, wrote a story a few years ago that it was unclear if prosecutors would appeal a jury’s verdict finding a defendant “not guilty” of a crime. The reporter apparently forgot his college Civics 101 in which we are taught the U.S. Constitution’s principle of “double jeopardy,” which prevents the government from putting people on trial twice for the same crime if a jury or judge has already found them “not guilty.” To the journalist, it was an innocent mistake. To the judges and lawyers, it showed that the reporter didn’t understand basic principles of law.

Follow The Paper
“Res ipsa loquitur.” Translated, this phrase means “the thing speaks for itself.” Documents are a court reporter’s best friend and perhaps the most valuable source of information. Significantly, public court records are libel proof. A document will not turn on you—it says what it says. A reporter must be willing to read documents—briefs, motions, rulings, legal treatises, and opinions—to be able to understand and report accurately what goes on in the courts.

Notwithstanding a growing trend of establishing electronic filing systems, every court case, whether civil or criminal, begins with a filing—a criminal charge, a claim for damages or a demand that specific action be taken. Reporters who cover the beat on a daily basis as well as those who cover specific cases must learn where these documents are filed and made part of the public record. Public records are found not only in the official file room, but also in judges’ chambers, on clerks’ desks and in the offices of defense attorneys (they are often allowed to check files out for preparing appeals) and prosecutors. Just because a file is not in the file room doesn’t make it less public. You have an absolute right to inspect and copy any document that has been publicly filed, no matter where it is located at any given time. Some documents may be filed under seal because they involve corporate trade secret information or because the parties may believe that publicly disclosing the information would improperly influence the jury pool. However, the reporter always has the right to file an appeal with the judge asking that the sealing of those documents be reconsidered.

Court clerks who assign a case number upon receiving a filed case are responsible for maintaining these documents. It is important to learn where these offices are located and the hours of operation. Befriend these clerks like any other source. They can be of tremendous assistance in locating particular cases or helping ensure that you can make at least a cursory review of all cases filed in any given day.

Some judges elect to keep all their pending files in their chambers. Obtaining access to these files can be more difficult in the event a judge takes an afternoon off or goes on vacation. That does not mean, however, that the files are not available. It does mean educating the judges and their staffs that you have a right to see them during the same hours that the clerk’s office is normally open.

Comprehensive court coverage requires that a reporter keep close track of all lawsuits and criminal cases that are filed to ensure that something of news value does not fall through the cracks or that the reporter does not become dependent on others to bring noteworthy cases to light. That can mean establishing a system to review, after hours, those filings that come into the courthouse just before closing time. Establishing good relationships with docket and filing clerks will help in obtaining copies of documents rather than being forced to take hand-written notes. Attempting at least to scan every lawsuit and keeping track by number enables a reporter to determine when cases are filed under seal, those cases that are assigned a number, but not filed publicly.

Many jurisdictions have established Web sites for lower and appellate courts that list case filings and rulings. While very good for research purposes, not all materials are available on a timely basis. Further, unpublished opinions (discussed later in this chapter) issued by appellate courts—often are not put online. Electronic access to federal case information is also available through the Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) system. There is no charge to sign up and charges for printing or online time is relatively inexpensive.

Continue to the next page in "Chapter 7: Covering the Courts" >>>
<<< Return to the previous page in "Chapter 7: Covering the Courts "

 

 



© 2003 Criminal Justice Journalists

Created with the cooperation of the Institute for Justice and Journalism, Annenberg School for Communication, University of Southern California,
and the Jerry Lee Center of Criminology, University of Pennsylvania

Made possible by a grant from the Ford Foundation