Covering Crime and Justice Written and edited by
Criminal Justice Journalists
crimjj.wordpress.com

Search by:
  Table of Contents

  Topics
  

  Text Search
  

Chapter Sidebars
  • Resources
  • Story Ideas

Chapter 8
Covering Criminal Courts

In this chapter


Introduction
Plea Bargaining
   Out-Of-Court Deals
Charges
Pre-Trial Proceedings
Motions
The Trial
   The Evidence
   Cross-Examination
   Closing Arguments
   Jury Deliberations
   Juror Interviews
   Sentencing
   Death Penalty Cases

The Appeal
   DNA Testing



     

Introduction
While the police reporter usually begins work after the commission of a crime, the first contact that a courts reporter has with a criminal case comes after, or simultaneous with, the filing of a charge.

Because the police and court beats frequently overlap, this chapter will outline the steps leading from a charge to a final appeal of a criminal case without covering territory explained in Chapter 1, on the crime beat.

Most cases are not resolved by a trial and most will fly under the media radar. A 2004 U.S. Department of Justice study of felony cases involving more than one million adults who were convicted showed that 95 percent of the cases ended with a guilty plea. A large number of the cases—63 percent—involved either narcotics or property crimes. Violent crimes made up about 19 percent of the cases, but murder cases (including manslaughter) made up not quite one percent of the cases. (http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/abstract/fssc02.htm)

There are three different ways that a suspect can be charged with a crime and become a defendant in a criminal proceeding.

Arrest: A law enforcement agency, whether city or town police, a county sheriff’s department, state police, or a federal law enforcement authority such as the FBI, Drug Enforcement Administration, or Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, takes someone into custody and places him or her under arrest. In many state and federal jurisdictions, a prosecutor will review the evidence and approve or reject the filing of a charge by police.

Grand jury indictment: A grand jury is made up of citizens who are summoned for duty much like trial jurors. They serve for varying periods of time ranging from one month to as long as three years. They meet secretly in a courthouse and are directed by prosecutors. They can meet as frequently as every day to once a month or whenever prosecutors wish to bring evidence or a prospective indictment before them. Grand juries hear testimony from witnesses, including victims, law enforcement officers, investigators, and sometimes even prospective defendants, and then vote whether to return an indictment. A simple majority is all that is needed to approve an indictment. A grand jury has subpoena power and often is used as an investigative tool by the prosecution. Grand jurors take an oath to keep secret what goes on before the grand jury and prosecutors are bound by court rules to refrain from discussing grand jury proceedings. Witnesses, however, are free to speak about their testimony or what occurred during their appearances before a grand jury. A prospective defendant is referred to as a target or subject of a grand jury investigation. An indictment is filed with the clerk of court and is assigned to a judge where future proceedings then take place. Grand jurors may be appointed by judges or county commissioners (also known as the “key man system,”) or from the general jury pool. Most jurisdictions do not allow the defendant’s attorney or attorneys for the witnesses to be present with them during grand jury questioning, although several jurisdictions are considering a change in that policy. Witnesses are allowed to leave the grand jury while testifying to consult with their lawyers.

Information: A prosecuting authority, whether a local district attorney or a local U.S. attorney, may initiate a criminal case by filing a formal charge with the clerk of the court. In many states, the majority of criminal cases are brought by “information” because there is no grand jury function. In the federal court, authorities are empowered to file a criminal information when the charge is a misdemeanor. In the case of a felony, federal prosecutors are permitted to file a criminal information only when the defendant waives the right to have the evidence considered by a grand jury.

After a charge has been filed, a defendant has a right to a bond hearing. If the case has been generated by an arrest, a defendant typically must be allowed to come before a judge or magistrate within a proscribed period of time—often 48 hours. At that hearing, a prosecutor presents a summary of the evidence and requests a setting of bond. A defense attorney is allowed to make a presentation regarding the setting of bond, but there is no direct challenging of the evidence. Whatever must be posted to obtain release pending disposition of the charges is usually referred to as the bail. Bonds and bail can take many forms. Some bonds require that 100 percent of the face amount be posted, others require only 10 percent and still others may require only that a defendant give a signature to a promise to appear in court. These latter bonds are known as “signature bonds” or “individual” or “own” recognizance bonds—and are referred in shorthand as "OR" or "IR" bonds.

After a judge sets the bond, a defendant usually has the right to what is often called a preliminary hearing, which involves presentation of evidence before a judge, who rules on whether there is probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed and that the defendant committed the crime. This judge is usually not the judge who will preside over a trial in the case, should one occur.

Probable cause is a lesser burden of proof than the “guilty beyond a reasonable doubt” that is required at trial. Probable cause is defined as a reasonable belief that a person has committed a crime. The test the courts use to determine whether probable cause existed for purposes of arrest is whether the facts and circumstances within an officer’s knowledge are sufficient to warrant a prudent person to believe a suspect has committed a crime.

In many jurisdictions, a defendant is entitled to a preliminary hearing within a statutory period of time such as 30 days. Frequently, prosecutors will avoid putting on their evidence at a preliminary hearing by presenting it in secret to a grand jury shortly after a bond hearing.

After the return of an indictment or filing of a criminal information, a defendant is arraigned. This is when the accused is formally asked to enter a plea to the pending charge(s). Typically, at the arraignment, unless a defendant has previously reached an agreement with the prosecution, a plea of not guilty is entered. Defendants do not plead “innocent,” but plead “not guilty.” Remember that the legal process is designed to determine guilt or lack of guilt—technically, it is not a process of determining innocence. Juries and judges find defendants guilty or not guilty. There is not a finding of “innocence.” When a defendant pleads no contest—known formally as “nolo contendere,” a defendant does not admit to the charge, but does not deny it either and is willing to accept punishment. A slight variation of this plea is called an Alford plea (after a case in North Carolina) in which a defendant does not admit to the criminal act, but acknowledges that the prosecution has sufficient evidence to prove the charge. (Note that the Associated Press stylebook requires its reporters to use the word “innocent, rather than not guilty…to guard against the word ‘not’ being dropped inadvertently.”) Most arraignments are not noteworthy because the initial entering of a plea is a formality—remember that most cases are ultimately resolved by a guilty plea.

Continue to the next page in "Chapter 8: Covering Criminal Courts" >>>
<<< Return to the previous page in "Chapter 7: Covering the Courts"

 

 



© 2003-2010 Criminal Justice Journalists

Created with the cooperation of the Institute for Justice and Journalism, the Jerry Lee Center of Criminology at the University of Pennsylvania, and the Center on Media, Crime and Justice at John Jay College of Criminal Justice.

 

Made possible by grants from the Ford Foundation and the Donald W. Reynolds National Center for the Courts and Media at the University of Nevada Reno.