Covering Crime and Justice Written and edited by
Criminal Justice Journalists
www.reporters.net/cjj/

Search by:
  Table of Contents

  Topics
  

  Text Search
  

Chapter Sidebars
  • Resources
  • Story Ideas

Chapter 9
Covering Civil Courts

In this chapter


Introduction
   From Personal Injuries
     To Patents
   From Frivolous To
     Historic
   Making A Federal Case
The Beginning
   Tort Filings Up, Per
     Capita Filings Down
   Class Actions

Pre-Trial
   News In Discovery
   Summary Judgment
   Arbitration and Mediation
   The Trial
   A Different Burden of Proof
   Settlements
   Public or Secret?
   The Appeal
   Arguments and Opinions

Other Civil Courts



     

Class Actions
When a class action lawsuit is filed, a judge ultimately will decide whether the lawsuit is appropriate to proceed as a class action, as well as the membership of the class. It is important to remember that class action lawsuits seek to be declared a class action—the designation is not automatic. In recent years, class action lawsuits have become the target of legislators and in early 2005, President George W. Bush signed the Class Action Fairness Act, a bipartisan effort to move class-action lawsuits with claims of more than $5 million and plaintiffs from different states into federal court.

Class action lawsuits have provided benefits to consumers in many instances, however. For example, General Motors paid millions of dollars to settle claims brought by owners of Oldsmobiles that were built with substandard transmissions. And in 1999, makers of the diet drug Phen-Fen settled class action litigation for about $4 billion—that included continued testing costs of patients—after the drug was taken off the market when some users suffered heart valve damage.

--Monetary damages fall into two basic categories—compensatory and punitive. Compensatory damages are actual amounts of financial losses that can be proved and are sought to compensate the plaintiff. The proof can be in many forms, ranging from medical bills to lost wages to lost business income. In the case of wrongful death lawsuits, this can be lost income over the life span of the deceased. Punitive damages are in addition or alternative to compensatory damages and are designed to punish the defendant for engaging in the conduct in question as well as to set an example for others who would engage in similar conduct. In the case brought by Stella Liebeck, the 81-year-old woman who sued after spilling hot McDonald’s coffee, the jury awarded $200,000 in compensatory damages and $2.7 million in punitive damages. A third form of damages is called nominal damages (frequently $1) when there is no evidence of a clear amount of damages, but the judge or jury finds the plaintiff has prevailed in the lawsuit. A fourth form is called liquidated damages, which is an amount set forth in a contract that parties to the contract agree will be paid if a breach of the contract is determined later.

--Injunctions take various forms, but all basically carry the same meaning—a party is enjoined or ordered to take a specific action or refrain from taking a specific action. These orders can range from reinstatement to a job, a prohibition against dismissal from a job, an order to clean up pollution or an order to halt a looming strike by workers.

There are different types of injunctions, including:

--Temporary restraining order. Commonly referred to as a TRO, a lawsuit may seek an immediate hearing before a judge requesting that an order be entered that maintains the status quo pending a hearing on the claims of the lawsuit. A temporary restraining order can be entered without the defendant being present in court. It is designed to prevent a threatened harm from occurring—one that may cause irreparable damage. A TRO goes into effect when it is served upon the parties in question. It is not a ruling on the merits and it is intended to last only until a hearing on the merits of the issue in question can be conducted. These temporary restraining orders can be used to freeze bank accounts, shut down public dangers such as environmental pollution, or block pending union strikes.

--Preliminary injunction. Generally, a request for a TRO, if granted, sets the stage for a preliminary injunction hearing where evidence is presented and a judge issues a decision. A preliminary injunction is not a final ruling in the case, but is generally an indication that the party obtaining such an injunction may win the case. A judge, in granting a preliminary injunction, generally must find that the plaintiff has a substantial likelihood of success following a full hearing at a later date and that irreparable harm will occur if the injunction is not entered. The judge is required to balance the hardships that may occur to both sides in the case, as well as whether any public interest is affected.

--Permanent injunction. This is the final order that evolves from a preliminary injunction and is the order that ultimately will be appealed if an appeal is filed. A permanent injunction may follow another hearing or may result in an agreement between parties following issuance of a preliminary injunction so that the losing party may seek an expedited appeal.

Continue to the next page in "Chapter 9: Covering Civil Courts" >>>
<<< Return to the previous page in "Chapter 9: Covering Civil Courts"

 

 



© 2003 Criminal Justice Journalists

Created with the cooperation of the Institute for Justice and Journalism, Annenberg School for Communication, University of Southern California,
and the Jerry Lee Center of Criminology, University of Pennsylvania

Made possible by a grant from the Ford Foundation